Logo

Spacer Adoption Spacer Waiting Children Spacer Articles Spacer Voices of Adoption Spacer Adoption Community

Spacer
 
Send to friend
 
Print 
Spacer
Spacer
Photolistings
Spacer
Adoption Guide
Spacer
Find Agency
Spacer
Country Guidelines
Spacer
Special Needs FAQ
Spacer
Back Issues
Spacer
Adoption Events
Spacer
Help a Child
Spacer
Free Stuff
Spacer
Resources
Spacer
Spacer
Video Section
Spacer
 
Spacer
 
RainbowKids Newsletter
Join Now
 
Spacer
 
Contact Wizard
Contact Wizard
 
Spacer
 
Changing Trends in International Adoption
One year post-hague
April 01,2009 / Martha Osborne
Untitled Document In late March of this year, one of the largest annual gatherings of International Adoption professionals was held in Indianapolis , Indiana . Each year the Joint Council on International Child Services holds a conference focusing on the medical, legal, social and humanitarian issues surrounding intercountry adoption. Attendees include adoption agency professionals, social workers, medical specialists, representatives from the Department of State, and others who work and advocate for orphaned and abandoned children throughout the world.

April of 2008 brought the enactment of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption , which many believed would bring such great challenges to parents and adoption agencies, that international adoption would become rare. In truth, the Hague has forcibly brought changes that most adoption professionals have been desiring for years. These include pre-adoption education classes for adoptive families, standardized procedures for all countries involved, and avenues for agency accountability.

This year, the JCICS conference opened with a decidedly poignant new offering: The entire first day of the conference was dedicated to Adult Adoptees. Many of these adoptees came from Korea , Vietnam , Columbia , and India . Nearly 90% of those who attended or spoke at the sessions were currently working in the field of adoption. Working together, these pioneers of international adoption came together to plan and implement a day of sharing their experiences growing up in the USA, connecting and growing as individuals, choosing to enter the field of child advocacy, and all that they had learned from their experiences. They spoke of growing up in the 60's, 70's, and 80's and of all that had changed, and all that had not.

They set the tone of the conference with the open ended question, "How can we get more adoptive families to really hear what we are trying to share with them?" As heads nodded and hands clapped, attendees continued the discussion for the following 4 days of the conference. Ideas were shared and concerns voiced. A general consensus was reached that the educational tools (especially those online) exist already to teach families about post-institutional, medical, transracial, and health issues of international adoptees. The educational component is available. But the issue comes with helping families really hear what they don't want to hear: Adoption is not the same as giving birth .

There are issues surrounding identity, race and culture that are lifelong and individualized for each child. The effects of institutionalization on behavior, brain, and body development can be anticipated and improved upon greatly in children who are helped soon after adoption. For adoption professionals, promoting healthy families means more than just bringing together a child in need and a family willing to parent. Helping families understand and prepare for these challenges before adoption, while balancing the delicate "worse case, best case" scenarios for children, is a continuous challenge to all involved. The consensus from most attendees at the convention was this: "We need to require more pre-adoption education for families, and they are going to hate us for it." Perhaps. But it will still be a trend in the future to at least offer families more advanced preparation prior to adoption. A good trend .

The most obvious trend in Intercountry adoption is difficult to accept: Very young, non-special needs children are becoming a rarity in adoption. The reasons for this trend are varied:

  • The Hague requires more documentation on a child's abandonment/orphan status, requiring a child to stay in the care of an institution for a longer period of time.
  • Placing countries, which are often very limited on available resources for special-needs children, are making the adoption of special needs children a priority.
  • Vocal opponents to the adoption of children internationally are gaining a foothold in the popular media. This attention can be exploitive, but does often cause misgivings towards adoption by the general populace of placing-countries. It is an unfortunate reality that those who write the news are often the least informed on the issues. The most important thing that each of us can do to battle this influence is to become informed and vocal, while still respectful to all parties involved.

This is not the say that healthy children under 18-months of age are not available for adoption. There are programs still placing non-special needs children under age 2 years. There is simply a noticeable movement by countries placing children internationally towards advocating most strongly for special needs and older children. Knowing this, pre-adoptive families can make the best choices for their situation.

A final and very positive trend in international adoption has taken our community by storm. By the thousands, families are educating themselves about various special needs. They are taking this knowledge and pursuing the adoption of children who may not have, in previous years, ever had the opportunity to grow up in a family. "We're seeing a much more educated group of interested families," said Peg Studaker of Children's Home Society and Family Services. "Families who contact us today about a waiting child on RainbowKids have already done the research. This really helps everyone make more informed decisions. It's good for the child, and good for the interested family."

International adoption is a constantly evolving process, one which will continue to offer changes and challenges in the near and distant future. Though stressful, these developments should not be viewed in a purely positive/negative light. In the end, each of us desires the same outcome: Children in permanent, positive placements. And that is a trend we can all work towards.

Read more on this topic
Adopting the International Child with Special Needs  | Attachment and the Special Needs Child | Adopting a Special Needs Child...Is It For You?
Spacer
 
Send to friend
 
Print 
Add Your Comments
Name (optional)
Email (optional)
Your Comments  500 chars left
Rate this Article
Rate Here
Current Rating
Excellent (Rated by 38 readers.)
Readers Comments  (9 Comments)  View All Comments
Adoption is not the same as giving birth according to this article. This article does not address the thousands of children who have been adopted internationally thriving and doing great. Being a parent to these children and providing them with a loving home is the MOST important thing for these children. Giving birth does not make a parent nor does it make a family. More constraints on possible adoptive families leave more children in institutions. How is that progress?- Anonymous
I feel that children with special nedds here in the US are being over looked. And that this country has been becoming anti adoption of it's own for many years. It is not a susprise that it would move to other countries. I am adult adoptee from the US , and adoptive mother from foster care. And a sister to adoptee from Greece.- Anonymous
The Hague convention make adoption a nightmare for adopt parents. The paper work is endeless, the burocracy take years and the children who are in wait become older as the paper work is done. The small countries has no social work enough to do the work besides the low pay they get.- sulamita crabb
I have often wondered how a process as convoluted and illogical as the Hague Process could have been developed. When I read comments regarding the so-called "benefits" of a longer period of institutionalization for small children, I get a better sense of the misguided logic that has created this process. I really think that the professionals involved in these processes need to step back and see the forest for the trees. We are talking about saving children--not bureaucrats!- Father of Five
One thing we have noticed, as a waiting family, is that placing countries are slow to comply with US rules. We are now awaiting documents to do the I800 forms and Estonia does not want to release them because they have never had to do it before...... how frustrating.- Kathy
Very interesting article. I'd love to hear more from the adult adoptees.- Serena
I'm glad that you mentioned vocal opponents of adoption. I support Save the Children and other charities, but I wonder at their blanket anti-adoption stance in the international community.- Anonymous
I think another trend, and an unfortunate one, is that the agencies are shouldering a greater amount of cost for the new required services by the Hague. This cuts back on the available dollars for humanitarian programs. Such a tragedy!- Tamara
I enjoyed meeting you, Martha, at the conference. I think that you have a good summary here of the main concerns many of us share. Now if we can just get that central education & resource area going! Good work.- Karen F.
Home   |   Contact Us   |   About Us   |   Advertise on RK   |   Link to RK   |   Site Map   |   Sponsors Login
Copyright © 2006 RainbowKids.com. Created and maintained by QualityClix
This site is optimized for Netscape 4 and Internet Explorer 4 or higher.
About Us Contact Us Advertise With Us Choose a Country Find an Agency Find a Child Home